The World Series of Tattooing™
June 26–28, 2026
Morgan MFG | Chicago, IL$15,000 Prize Pool
32 Artists
3 Days
One Champion
WSOTT Judging Standards & Definitions
A transparent, reduction-based scoring system designed to evaluate tattooing with consistency, clarity, and accountability.
PhilosophyHow Scoring WorksEvery mark matters. Every decision is scored.
At its core, this system is built on a simple principle:
Every mark in a tattoo should be intentional.
Marks that lack intention or fall short of technical execution, are subject to point reduction.
This creates a system where:
Artists are judged on execution, not reputation
Outcomes are measurable
Results can be compared across battles
Preliminary Round: 100 Point System Each tattoo starts at 100 points
Judges deduct:
1 point per flaw
2 or more points for severe flaws
The highest remaining score advances
Battle Brackets: Head-to-Head ScoringArtists are compared across 10 criteria
For each criterion:
The better tattoo earns 1 point per criterion
Artist with the most points wins the battle
This removes total score bias and forces direct comparison
Mastery Bracket: SeedingSeeding is based on point differential from previous battles.
Example:
Artist wins a battle 6–4
Their differential = +2
Higher differentials earn higher seeds:
Highest seed vs lowest
Middle seeds face each other
This rewards not just winning but winning convincingly
Important Note on Tattoo DesignDesign Composition is only judged during the Mastery Bracket
This ensures fairness, since earlier rounds may involve tattooing designs created by other artists
TiebreakersIf scores are tied:
Completion time is considered
The faster finished tattoo wins or earns higher placement
All tattoos in comparison will be of similar size and style to maintain fairness
Criteria BreakdownJudging Criteria
Each tattoo is evaluated across 10 core criteria:
Application
Design Composition (Mastery only)
Line Work
Saturation
Contrast
Flow
Creativity
Size
Stencil Placement
Speed
-
Smooth, even, and consistent ink distribution.
Reduction for:
Inconsistency
Skin trauma
Unintentional markings
-
Balance and alignment of elements within the design.
Reduction for:
Imbalance
Misalignment
-
Clean, intentional lines with consistent weight and direction.
Reduction for:
Wavy or broken lines
Deviations from intended design
Inconsistent line weight
-
Even, intentional pigment distribution and coverage.
Reduction for:
Patchiness
Overworking
Blotchy transitions
-
Effective use of skin break, mid-tone, and black.
Reduction for:
Flat or muddy values
Lack of intentional contrast
-
Cohesion and movement within the tattoo.
Reduction for:
Choppy transitions
Lack of structure or intentional movement
-
Measured by client flash selection, not judge opinion.
More selected designs = stronger performance
Reduction for:
Fewer selections than opponent
-
Adherence to required size parameters.
Reduction for:
Too large or too small for intended placement
-
How well the tattoo fits the body.
Reduction for:
Poor flow with anatomy
Misplacement
-
Completion within the allotted time.
Used as:
A tiebreaker when scores are equal
A reduction if unfinished
-
Professionalism is part of the competition.
Client complaints about artist behavior may result in point deductions
Severe issues may result in disqualification
This ensures that:
Experience matters
Respect for the client is upheld
Why This Matters
Tattooing has never had a standardized competitive format
Objective scoring
Head-to-head comparison
Measurable performance across styles
It doesn’t remove artistry.
It makes execution undeniable.